Advertisement
New Zealand markets closed
  • NZX 50

    12,478.50
    -186.50 (-1.47%)
     
  • NZD/USD

    0.6219
    -0.0024 (-0.38%)
     
  • NZD/EUR

    0.5575
    -0.0012 (-0.22%)
     
  • ALL ORDS

    8,437.20
    +20.20 (+0.24%)
     
  • ASX 200

    8,209.50
    +17.60 (+0.21%)
     
  • OIL

    72.00
    +0.05 (+0.07%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,639.90
    +25.30 (+0.97%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,678.64
    -161.18 (-0.81%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,237.55
    -91.17 (-1.09%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    41,941.09
    -84.10 (-0.20%)
     
  • DAX

    18,729.96
    -272.42 (-1.43%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,258.57
    +245.41 (+1.36%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,723.91
    +568.58 (+1.53%)
     
  • NZD/JPY

    89.7470
    +0.7790 (+0.88%)
     

Following a 23% decline over last year, recent gains may please Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW) institutional owners

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Edwards Lifesciences' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 83% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Institutional investors would appreciate the 3.6% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 23%.

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Edwards Lifesciences, beginning with the chart below.

Check out our latest analysis for Edwards Lifesciences

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Edwards Lifesciences?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Edwards Lifesciences. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Edwards Lifesciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Edwards Lifesciences. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.8% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.7% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.4% of the company stock.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 25 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Edwards Lifesciences

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that Edwards Lifesciences Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$337m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com