New Zealand markets close in 2 hours 47 minutes
  • NZX 50

    11,703.64
    -110.70 (-0.94%)
     
  • NZD/USD

    0.6247
    -0.0012 (-0.19%)
     
  • NZD/EUR

    0.6188
    -0.0011 (-0.17%)
     
  • ALL ORDS

    7,366.20
    +8.50 (+0.12%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,120.50
    +7.70 (+0.11%)
     
  • OIL

    90.27
    -0.23 (-0.25%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,768.30
    -2.90 (-0.16%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    13,505.99
    +35.13 (+0.26%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,541.85
    +26.10 (+0.35%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    33,999.04
    +18.72 (+0.06%)
     
  • DAX

    13,697.41
    +70.70 (+0.52%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    19,815.44
    +51.53 (+0.26%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    28,965.52
    +23.38 (+0.08%)
     
  • NZD/JPY

    84.9720
    -0.0090 (-0.01%)
     

Here's What Black Mountain Acquisition Corp.'s (NYSE:BMAC) Shareholder Ownership Structure Looks Like

·4-min read

If you want to know who really controls Black Mountain Acquisition Corp. (NYSE:BMAC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of US$344m, Black Mountain Acquisition is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Black Mountain Acquisition.

View our latest analysis for Black Mountain Acquisition

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Black Mountain Acquisition?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

Black Mountain Acquisition already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Black Mountain Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 5.2% of Black Mountain Acquisition. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. John Bennett is currently the largest shareholder, with 20% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

Insider Ownership Of Black Mountain Acquisition

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Black Mountain Acquisition Corp.. Insiders have a US$69m stake in this US$344m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Black Mountain Acquisition. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Black Mountain Acquisition (2 are a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting