Yahoo Finance PerkinElmer Inc (PKI) Q3 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript
Image source: The Motley Fool.
PerkinElmer Inc (NYSE: PKI)
Q3 2018 Earnings Conference Call
Oct. 31, 2018, 5:00 p.m. ET
Contents:
Prepared Remarks
Questions and Answers
Call Participants
Prepared Remarks:
Operator
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q3 2018 PerkinElmer Earnings Conference Call. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this call may be recorded.
I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Tommy Thomas, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.
Tommy Thomas -- Vice President of Investor Relations
Thanks, Chris. Good afternoon, and welcome to the PerkinElmer third quarter 2018 earnings conference call. With me in the call are Rob Friel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Jamey Mock, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
If you have not received a copy of our earnings press release, you may get one from the Investors section of our website at www.perkinelmer.com. Please note that this call is being webcast live and will be archived on our website until November 14, 2018.
Before we begin, we need to remind everyone of the Safe Harbor statements that we have outlined in our earnings press release, issued earlier this afternoon and also those in our SEC filings. Any forward-looking statements made today represent our views only as of today. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements in the future, even if our estimates change. So you should not rely on any of today's forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date after today.
During this call, we will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures we plan to use during this call to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is available as an attachment to our earnings press release. To the extent, we use non- GAAP financial measures during this call that are not reconciled to GAAP in that attachment, we will provide reconciliations promptly.
I'm now pleased to introduce the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PerkinElmer, Rob Friel. Rob?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Tommy. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us today. I'm very pleased to report that PerkinElmer had another strong quarter, delivering revenue growth of 22% on a reported basis and core organic revenue growth of 7%, with each of our core businesses growing organically 7%. Including the impact of EUROIMMUN, our Diagnostics business grew organically 8%, as EUROIMMUN once again grew double- digits.
While our organic growth exceeded our guidance, total adjusted dollar revenue of $675 million only equal our guidance as changes in foreign currency rates relative to the dollar since the end of last quarter reduced revenue by approximately 2% or $10 million. We are also pleased with our adjusted earnings-per-share growth in the quarter, which increased 23% over Q3 last year to $0.90 per share. This was $0.02 lower than our original guidance, as the incremental income from the greater organic growth was more than offset by the negative impact of the foreign exchange movements previously mentioned, as well as higher long-term compensation costs caused mostly by the strong growth of our stock price during the third quarter.
If we adjusted for the impact of these two unforecasted items, our adjusted EPS would have been $0.97, which would have beat our guidance by $0.05. While Jamey will discuss our financial results in more detail, we continue to be very pleased with both the breadth and level of organic growth, as well as with our significant adjusted EPS growth.
As has been the case all year, our strong top line organic growth is attributable to both favorable end market conditions and the benefits of focusing our portfolio on fewer technologies and higher growth end markets where we have differentiated capabilities and excellent customer relationships.
During the third quarter, we continued to make minor adjustments to the portfolio as we completed the sale of our multispectral imaging product to acquire Biosciences, a portfolio company owned by Telegraph Hill Partners. We will continue to partner with (inaudible) on advanced tissue imaging technologies to realize the potential of this technology to benefit immuno-oncology and other areas of disease, research and treatments.
Also, we recently closed the acquisition of Dani Instruments. Based in Milan, Italy, Dani brings advanced capabilities in gas chromatography to help accelerate our workflow solutions in food, pharma and environmental end markets. We also continue to add access to a broader suite of potentially disruptive technologies and capabilities through our ongoing investments in smart technology companies and licensing efforts.
While both organic and inorganic investments over the last couple of years have been largely focused on increasing our growth profile, these moves have also resulted in our portfolio of technologies that are increasingly more synergistic and capable. It is clear to us that technologies, applications and customer needs are converging across DAS and Diagnostics as our customers businesses evolve and the lines between therapeutics, diagnostics, food and digital health are intersecting.
As we continue to both add and focus our capabilities, the opportunities across PerkinElmer expand, allowing DAS to become an enabler of the sciences of diagnostics and vice versa. Creating a culture and organizational nimbleness to facilitate this is seamlessly as possible and respond quickly to these opportunities will provide, in our view, another lever to further support our customers and enable incremental growth.
To that end, we recently brought together our top 175 scientists, engineers and product managers with a particular emphasis on our new acquisitions, to discuss opportunities, to accelerate collaboration around several key areas, including assay development, genomics, automated workflows and digital solutions. To give a sense of these opportunities, we see the ability to more comprehensively pull together our immunoassay development capabilities across the Company, including our life science ELISA reagents, our EUROIMMUN antibody and antigen development expertise, our automated newborn screening assay platforms and our lateral flow technologies from both bioscientific and our Tulip Immunodiagnostic business in India.
Another example of this is the development of assays for Zika, Dengue and Chikungunya viruses using our dry blood spot technologies, as well as rapid the lateral flow test created by combining -- EUROIMMUN's antigen capabilities with lateral flow technology from Tulip. These viruses are substantial health threat in emerging markets and the introduction of these tests are enabling customers in rural areas to more broadly screen potential patients at risk for these dangerous infectious diseases.
In the food segment, we are looking at ways to leveraging combine our diagnostic focused Applied Genomics technologies in automation liquidity and molecular testing with our broader DAS food analysis capabilities. For example, we are developing genomic and molecular solutions to enable new applications, including the rapidly growing area of cannabis testing, where we are creating a comprehensive analysis suite from extracting to analysis for (inaudible) and pathogen detection and for active ingredient and strain characterization. With the recent legalization of cannabis in Canada and other countries expected to follow soon, we see a significant market opportunity to support both the testing and basic research around cannabis.
And I've mentioned previously, this convergence of technologies applications and customer demand will be ignited by the move to digital and the power of data. Therefore, we are also looking at ways to build and expand our digital capabilities across the Company. This includes establishing common instrument and big data platforms that collect data and then discover insights that will ultimately better inform us and our customers.
An important part of generating these new sites is the use of artificial intelligence or AI. We made several investments across the Company in this area, both in terms of external partnerships and collaborations, as well as internal projects and building out our own AI capabilities. We are now driving AI across almost all of our DAS and diagnostic businesses, including for image analysis in our high content screening and immunodiagnostics businesses for better determining the quality of grain in our food business and for applying AI in our services business to help optimize our customer's laboratory productivity.
By taking advantage of our capabilities and technology platforms that span applications, strong operating capabilities and joint marketing opportunities, we are confident that PerkinElmer can meaningfully help lead this industry transformation. One of the best examples of the potential of our cohesive portfolio is the story of our Vanadis non-invasive prenatal testing solution. The Vanadis solution leverage is unique, highly sensitive rolling circle amplification and our validation expertise of diagnostics with the leading image detection capabilities of the DAS business.
Furthermore, this system is totally integrated workflow that leverages our current software being used in the biochemical prenatal screening today, thus allowing lab technicians to operate Vanadis with less than one week of training. As we have been working with our customers to install and validate Vanadis in their labs, the actions so far has been very positive and we expect to receive CE IVD approval very soon. Because this solution removes the technical complexity of NIPT, we're breaking down the cost barriers. We are excited to enable more women to have access to an accurate, low cost method of screening trisomies and improve the standard of prenatal care on a global level.
As we begin to establish our priorities for 2019, our focus will continue to be on innovation and improving our customer experience within DAS and diagnostics. However, we are increasingly looking at driving synergies across the businesses as well. Looking ahead, we see significant opportunities from these additional cross PerkinElmer synergies to both expand our addressable markets and drive incremental revenue growth. We also believe that this will provide opportunities for efficiencies and most importantly, enable us to innovate at an unprecedented pace, thereby facilitating continued acceleration of top line growth and operating margins.
Before turning the call over to Jamey, I want to briefly mention our end markets and touch on our guidance for the full year. As I mentioned previously, from a macro perspective, our markets continue to experience good demand. Diagnostics, which represents 40% of our revenue, is continuing to benefit from a growing prevalence of infectious and autoimmune diseases, particularly in emerging markets. In addition, the increasing demand for earlier diagnosis and the rising adoption of new technologies are fueling growth across all three segments of reproductive health, immunodiagnostics and genomics.
Slightly offsetting this is the continued decline in birth rates, particularly in China and the US. And life sciences, which represents about 35% of our revenue, we continue to see robust demand in both product sales and services within the pharma and biotech markets particularly in US and Asia. Within our food analysis business, strong growth is being driven by the rising outbreaks of food-borne illnesses, advances in technology for food safety testing, increasingly stringent regulations and the globalization of food supply.
Lastly, our environmental and applied markets generally track macroeconomic conditions and as such experienced stronger growth in Asia and the Americas this quarter. As a result of these favorable market conditions, as well as our product portfolio and capabilities through the first nine months of this year, every geographic region as well as all six market segments are growing 5% or better.
Now turning to our guidance. As you recall, our original forecast back in January for this year was full year organic revenue growth of 4.4% to 5% and adjusted EPS of $3.50. Since then, we have raised our top line guidance each quarter, and again this quarter, we are now guiding full year core organic revenue growth of 6.5%.
On the bottom line, we are guiding to $3.60 for the full year, which on a foreign exchange adjusted basis is $0.21 higher than our original January guidance and $0.02 higher than guidance last quarter and represents adjusted EPS growth of 24% versus 2017.
I'd now like to turn the call over to Jamey.
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Rob, and good evening everyone. I want to start with the financial highlights for the third quarter of 2018, next I'll provide some additional color on our served end markets in detail on other financial metrics. I'll finish with the financial summary for the fourth quarter and the implications on our revised 2018 guidance.
Starting with the third quarter results, we continue to be pleased with the strength in our business as core organic revenue, ex EUROIMMUN, in the third quarter of 2018 grew approximately 7% on tougher prior period comparison. Adjusted revenue in the third quarter grew 22% to $675 million, matching our revenue guidance as higher organic revenue growth offset incremental foreign exchange headwinds. Acquisitions added approximately 16%.
By business segment, diagnostics representing approximately 40% of total core sales grew 7% organically driven by our immunodiagnostics and applied genomics business lines. Incorporating EUROIMMUN, diagnostics would have grown 8% organically. Discovery and analytical solutions representing approximately 60% of total sales also grew approximately 7% organically in the third quarter, highlighted by good balance of strength in both life sciences and applied end markets. I will provide some additional color on both businesses in a moment.
Core revenue saw growth in all major geographies with double-digit organic revenue growth in Asia, high single-digit organic revenue growth in the Americas and low single-digit organic revenue growth in Europe. This represents five consecutive quarters of organic revenue growth in all major geographies.
In the emerging market regions, we continue to see double-digit organic revenue growth once again driven by China and India. On a year-to- date basis, we are pleased to have delivered 7% organic revenue growth, excluding EUROIMMUN and 8% organic revenue growth with EUROIMMUN. As Rob mentioned, we have experienced broad-based strength, experiencing mid-single-digit organic revenue growth in all end markets and geographies.
Moving to the details of our operational performance, third quarter adjusted gross margins were up 120 basis points, with year-to-date results up 140 basis points, largely driven by EUROIMMUN. This strong expansion has enabled us to make targeted investments, specifically increasing sales and marketing resources and R&D for disruptive technologies like Vanadis enabling a better organic revenue growth profile for 2019 and beyond.
We believe that continued mix improvements along with productivity and strong leverage continues to give us confidence in our 22% adjusted operating margin target laid out to investors in 2017. Operationally, for the third quarter of 2018 we delivered 90 basis points of adjusted operating margins when excluding foreign exchange and unplanned incremental compensation expenses.
As you may recall when guiding future quarters, we utilize the ending exchange rates from the prior quarter. Due to the volatility experienced in Q3, particularly in China and emerging markets, the actual year-over-year foreign exchange impact on adjusted operating margins was 20 basis points. To help you more clearly understand this dynamic, we have provided a foreign exchange reconciliation sheet on our website that is part of the Q3 2018 reporting package.
The unplanned compensation expense, which had a 60 basis point impact on our adjusted operating margins was driven by a significant share price increase during the third quarter and higher projected performance driven by stronger revenue growth and an improved gross margin outlook. As Rob mentioned, operationally, adjusted earnings per share would have been $0.97, however, the impact from foreign exchange headwinds of $0.03 and unplanned compensation expenses of $0.04 resulted in adjusted earnings per share of $0.90, an increase of 23% on a year-over-year basis.
Looking further into the key drivers within our segments, for the third quarter of 2018, let's start with discovery and analytical solutions. Our results were driven by balanced strong high single-digit organic revenue growth in life sciences, coupled with mid single-digit organic revenue growth in the applied market verticals. Life Sciences strength was driven by continued performance in pharma, biotech and the pharma biotech end market. Core pharmaceutical sales in our spectroscopy and chromatography product line saw good growth, and we are especially enthused to see our customers focus more on their core drug discovery efforts, an area of strength for our portfolio.
Our reagent products in instruments for high throughput screening have benefited from a renewed focus on small molecule research. Our new in-vivo imaging products launched late last year at the World Molecular Imaging Congress saw a very strong quarter of growth and we're a key driver of the pull-over performance in DAS.
Finally, we once again saw strength in our OneSource service business. We experienced solid growth in Q3 from applied markets, driven by strong food product performance in spectroscopy, LC/mass spec and (inaudible). Total food was up low double-digits. The environmental and industrial segments combined to deliver strong organic revenue growth of 6%.
Switching to diagnostics, core organic revenue growth grew 7% driven by double-digit organic revenue growth in immunodiagnostics and applied genomics with low single-digit organic revenue growth in reproductive health. Looking further within our diagnostics business, we continue to see strong results at Tulip and (inaudible) driving high-teens growth in our Immunodiagnostics segment. We experienced a good quarter in our genomics business as strong front-end sample prep results helped drive double-digit organic revenue growth.
We continued to build on our momentum in the genetic testing business despite the near-term disruption from the implementation of a new lab information management system and feel good about the progress we've achieved toward our $50 million revenue goal by 2020. EUROIMMUN continues to impress with low teens organic revenue growth through the first three quarters of 2018.
Looking at disease modalities, autoimmune is approximately 60% of sales and their core capabilities helped drive 16% organic revenue growth through the third quarter. Autoimmune diseases unfortunately remains under-treated and under-diagnosed and some studies have shown that the annual incidence rate to be approximately 10%. Infectious disease, allergy and instrument sales for antigen detection represent the balance of EUROIMMUN sales and were also steady growers, with combined double-digit organic revenue growth.
For the full year of 2018, we continue to expect approximately 15% organic revenue growth from EUROIMMUN. Geographically for EUROIMMUN, high incidence rates and incremental global customer wins helped China and Germany experience organic revenue growth of low double- digits and high teens, respectively, and combined with building momentum in the US driven by menu expansion at a large reference lab has enabled the organization to see continuing revenue growth into 2019.
Looking at below the line items, adjusted net interest and other expense for the third quarter was approximately $15 million and our adjusted tax rate was approximately 12% driven by discrete items. Looking ahead, we now see a full year adjusted tax rate at 15% and 14% in the fourth quarter of 2018.
As Rob mentioned, we have sold our multi-spectral imaging business to acquire BioSciences for approximately $37 million, resulting in a GAAP pre-tax gain of approximately $13 million. This business had year-to-date revenues of approximately $23 million and we have posted another reconciliation on our website to help you adjust your financial models. Based on certain ongoing service agreements, interest expense reduction and other revenues, we expect negligible adjusted EPS from this transaction in 2018.
Turning to the balance sheet, we finished the quarter with approximately $1.9 billion of debt and $150 million of cash. We exited the quarter with a net debt-to-adjusted EBITDA ratio of approximately 3.1 times and we remain on track to finish the year below 3 times.
Turning to our cash flow performance, our third quarter operating cash flow from continuing operations saw strong sequential and year- over-year improvement. However, on a year-to-date basis, higher inventory levels, driven by stronger organic revenue growth, overseas production moves to further increase our manufacturing localization and added inventory needed for distribution center strategy is resulting in increased working capital use in 2018. We expect to make further progress in the fourth quarter, but forecast some of this improvement in inventory normalization to extend into 2019.
To wrap up the third quarter and year-to-date results, we continue to be enthused by our performance which has resulted in 7% year-to-date core organic revenue growth and 25% adjusted earnings-per-share growth. Looking ahead to the fourth quarter of 2018, we continue to believe that we are well positioned to drive solid organic revenue growth and provide strong financial results for our key stakeholders. For the fourth quarter of 2018, we are forecasting reported revenues of $745 million, representing 16% reported revenue growth versus the comparable prior period.
Our guidance assumes approximately 5% core organic revenue growth, $102 million in sales from EUROIMMUN and core foreign currency headwinds of approximately $12 million on a year-over-year basis. EUROIMMUN had approximately $14 million of sales in Q4 2017 stub period that you need to back out to arrive at our quarterly revenue guidance.
In terms of adjusted earnings per share guidance, we are forecasting a $1.16 for the fourth quarter, which represents 20% growth versus the comparable prior year period. This forecast includes an additional $0.04 headwind from foreign exchange versus our August guidance as you will see on the foreign exchange reconciliation sheet posted to our website.
We are once again raising our full-year 2018 core organic revenue growth guidance to 6.5%. This guidance continues to exclude EUROIMMUN, which would add another 100 basis points. We now expect reported revenue for the year to be approximately $2.768 billion, a reduction of $12 million from the previous revenue guidance of $2.78 billion due to incremental foreign exchange headwinds of $21 million, offset by improved organic growth in the third quarter. Our revenue guidance incorporates EUROIMMUN sales of approximately $364 million, essentially the same as our previous guidance.
We now forecast adjusted earnings per share of $3.60 for 2018, a reduction of $0.05 from the previous adjusted earnings per share guidance of $3.65, driven by unplanned compensation expense of $0.04 and incremental foreign exchange headwinds of $0.07, offset by improved organic revenue growth of $0.02 and a lower tax rate of $0.04.
As a recap on our full year adjusted earnings per share guidance, we improved on our initial $3.50 guidance with $0.15 from better organic revenue growth, $0.15 from lower taxes, offset by unfavorable foreign exchange of $0.11, $0.06 from higher interest expense and $0.03 from a higher share count to arrive at $3.60 adjusted earnings per share or 24% adjusted earnings-per-share growth for the full year.
This concludes my prepared remarks. Operator, at this time we would like to open the call for questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
(Operator Instructions) And our first question comes from Daniel Brennan with UBS. Your line is now open.
Daniel Brennan -- UBS -- Analyst
So Rob and Jamey, so on the DAS business, again another really strong quarter, another acceleration on the stack comp basis. You have a lot of details in the prepared remarks, but could you tease out a little bit more, what's enabled this growth because I kind of think this collection of businesses wasn't normally a 5% plus (inaudible) and that's what you've been putting up. How much was dependent on new products, how much of it is maybe a different commercial strategy, maybe some acquisitions, maybe can you just tease out kind of some of the drivers and how sustainable are they?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks for the question and I think you hit a couple of them. First of all, I would say as Jamey mentioned, the performance, first of all, was broad-based with really all the key end markets growing sort of high single-digits or better. But I think to your point, it's really broader than that, there's a lot of factors that are impacting the performance.
I would say, first of all, the markets are good. Obviously, pharma and biotech are increasing spending particularly we're finding in the drug discovery area. Food continues to see good growth because of whether its expanded regulations or increasing consumer awareness, but it's really broader than that for things like we're seeing nice growth from new products. We mentioned a couple, particularly in the life science area this quarter and the way I would think about it is, 2017, we really focused on significantly refreshing the analytical portfolio and that's continuing on nicely in '18 and then earlier this year, we really focused on the life science area.
So, you saw some new products come out in the imaging area. Clearly, on the reagent side, we've sort of refreshed there. I would say the other thing that's helping our performance is our decision to narrow our focus on selected end markets where it's really contributed to both a more concentrated marketing and customer engagement approach, and again focusing on those areas that inherently are higher growth.
And then finally on the execution side, I would say particularly in the commercial organization, we've created much better alignment between product management. And actually during the earlier part of this year, we trained the entire global sales force on a standardized, what I'll call, the lead to close process, and we're seeing that really improve our win rates. So it's really a combination of things, but at the end of the day, we feel very good about the performance of DAS. The team's executing well, they are 7% organically year-to-date and I think they go into 2019 with a terrific momentum.
Daniel Brennan -- UBS -- Analyst
And then maybe just as one follow-up kind of unrelated, but can you just elaborate a bit on EUROIMMUN in the US, certainly Germany and China were strong and US represents such a big greenfield opportunity. So, now that you've had the business for a while, how should we think about the US opportunity unfolding? I think when you did the deal, you contemplate this could be as much as like a $300 million market eventually for you. Thank you.
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I think we continue to feel very good about the opportunity in the US and I think it is a significant market opportunity. I think the question is how long it takes to ramp up and of course it's coming off of a relatively small base. So we continue to see very strong growth rates in the US, unfortunately, of their relatively low base. But I would say as we sort of go into the anniversary year, we haven't seen anything that diminishes in any way the opportunity and probably in many ways we see greater opportunity, I would say globally, but specifically in the US.
Operator
And our next question comes from Tycho Peterson with JPMorgan. Your line is now open.
Tycho Peterson -- JP Morgan -- Analyst
I'll start with one for Jamey on operating margins, about 150 basis points below what we've been modeling. I guess that was all stock-based comp, is that the reinterpretation and how should we think about that going forward? And any guidance you can give us on tax rate for '19, given the leverage you saw this quarter and we talked about the next?
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
On the operating margins, it was about 60 basis points in the quarter related to stock-based comp and then another 20 basis points of pressure related to foreign exchange. So absent that, we would have been at about 19.9%.
Tycho Peterson -- JP Morgan -- Analyst
Okay, then on the --
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
On the tax rate moving forward?
Tycho Peterson -- JP Morgan -- Analyst
Correct.
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
As I said in my prepared remarks, I think we are now at 15% for the year, which is down 200 basis points since 2017. Some of that is better, more profits in low tax jurisdictions and some of that are some discrete items. So we're looking at it for next year, but it's a little too soon to call the actual guidance for next year.
Tycho Peterson -- JP Morgan -- Analyst
And then Rob, just a follow-up on EUROIMMUN -- go ahead.
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I was going to say you. I know you asked a question relative to the incentive comp and how do we think about that sort of going forward and may I just take a second to explain it because it may be a little unique. So we think about our incentive comp for officers, it's very largely performance-based, probably depending on the officer anywhere from 60% to 70% and we're talking about these three-year long-term performance based. It's all tied to the stock price or at least some portion of it is tied and it's mostly equity.
However, there is a component of it that is paid in cash. And unlike the equity component, our accounting policy requires us to revalue the cash component each quarter depending on changes in our stock price. So if you look at that cash component and I know you're well aware, our stock price increased over 25% in the third quarter. So normally in any given quarter if our stocks move around a little bit, it's not a material item, but because of the magnitude of the move, it's required us to record of expenses, Jamey talked about.
Going forward, we generally don't model a lot of expense in there because, obviously, it's tough to predict our stock price. So going forward, we really would normally model much and again if the stock price moves 5%, it's not material. But like I said, with the strong movement in the third quarter, that's what yield the significant incentive compensation expense.
Tycho Peterson -- JP Morgan -- Analyst
Okay, then just one follow-up in EUROIMMUN, you talked about I think some assay development initiatives at the beginning of the call, was that specifically EUROIMMUN and any review of moving over to chemiluminescence versus ELISA given that's where kind of majority of the market is today?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
My comment on the assay development, well, although I talked about a specific instance where we are using EUROIMMUN antigen, it was really more broad based, let's say, that would imply that we're looking more across the Company now and largely because of some of the acquisitions we've made recently, so whether it's Bio, whether it's Tulip or whether it's EUROIMMUN, we're finding that we've got significant opportunity to leverage those businesses, whether it's their diagnostic business, the capabilities can go into DAS, so for example, in the food area, on the molecular side and vice versa.
And the specific example was one where we took capabilities from EUROIMMUN, capabilities from Tulip and our blood spot capability in newborn and really created not only a new product, but a new application that allowed us to go into a market that we're seeing nice growth in. So we're going to continue to look at opportunities to do that.
Specific to EUROIMMUN, the one thing that we're quite excited about, I think we've talked about this a couple of times, they have very good capable capabilities (inaudible) common antibodies and antigens. So, it allows us to get very specific antibodies for our assays. Furthermore, it allows us to driving this sort of new novel targets and get faster time to market. So, the (inaudible) was just to say we're increasing looking to leverage that and we think there is a significant opportunity as we go into '19 and '20 to benefit from that.
Operator
Our next question comes from Doug Schenkel with Cowen. Your line is now open.
Chris -- Cowen -- Analyst
This is Chris on for Doug today. Thanks for taking my question. So I just want to turn on diagnostics. Diagnostics core revenue growth, excluding EUROIMMUN (inaudible) as well, I know you have a number of new growth initiatives in this segment such as NGS testing, Vanadis in Tulip. So I'm curious as to how these are contributing to a solid core revenue growth rate and can you also just speak to the sustainability of these trends?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
So as I mentioned, it's coming from a number of areas. So our core -- what I'll call core immunodiagnostics which does not include EUROIMMUN grew high teens and as I think you know that's mostly focused in emerging markets. So, Tulip continues to grow double-digits and our historical call it Symbio or China diagnostic business continues to do quite well. In the applied genomics, we're also seeing very strong growth that also grew double-digits, that was fairly broad-based geographically.
And so I think those contribute the majority of the growth. I would say when we look at our reproductive health, newborn only grew -- I think it was 3% this quarter. I think year-to-date it's sort of mid-single and that's fundamentally because we're seeing some fairly significant headwinds from birth rate. So, the US is down low single-digits, Europe is down low single-digits. China, we think is down depending on the region of the country anywhere from mid to high single-digits.
So the fact that newborn is growing, let's say, year-to-date in the mid-single digits, we feel pretty good about because clearly it's not sustainable to have those types of negative growth rate. So we're actually -- so as we go into '19, we think we've got pretty good comps relative to the birth rates and we combine that with the success we're seeing this year with menu expansion and further penetration of newborns and we're quite excited about that. So we think the bottom line is, it is sustainable and when you put in areas like the genetic testing and some of the other things we're doing, we think it will potentially accelerate in '19.
Chris -- Cowen -- Analyst
And just one follow-up question. To be clear, has there been any change in margin expectations separate from FX and compensation? Just based on your prepared remarks, it sounded like you are making some incremental investments to each of the core revenue streams? Thanks.
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No change in expectation. As I mentioned, foreign exchange had a significant impact, as well as the incentive compensation, but the fundamentals are still there and we still see strong operating margin expansion in the 70 to 90 basis point range excluding foreign exchange and incentive compensation.
As for the investments we made, yes, we are increasing R&D and sales and marketing resources. So R&D has gone up from 6.3% of revenue to 6.8% this year and then sales and marketing has also increased year-over-year. So we continue to think that that's going to improve the organic growth profile of the Company.
Operator
And our next question comes from Dan Leonard with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.
Dan Leonard -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
So starting off, Rob, appreciate that comment that diagnostics could accelerate into 2019. Would you care to comment on DAS into 2019. Is there anything we should be mindful of from a comparison standpoint, whether it be on the pharma services business or anywhere else, or do you think or anything on the new product cycle front that we should be thinking about as we look at our models?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
No, I don't think so. As Jamey alluded to, it's a little early to talk about 2019. But I think from a trend perspective, we think the market still look attractive year. We will continue to come out with new products. We've got some (inaudible) that we expect to get out in the earlier part of next year. I would say, obviously the second quarter has got a little bit of tough comps, say good 10%. But I don't see anything systemic that should create any significant headwinds for DAS.
Dan Leonard -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
And as for my follow-up, Rob, appreciate those comments on the cannabis industry at the research. I was hoping you could perhaps quantify the opportunity there from an analytical instruments standpoint?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Well, I would say we're seeing very significant growth, but again to the similar to you mean US numbers, it's starting off of a relatively low base. But we think we've got probably, if not the -- one of the most expansive capabilities when you look at the need to look at pesticide analysis and quality control of the cannabis. And so I think we could probably double the business going into 2019. Right now, it's probably about a $10 million business, it probably doubles in 2019. Ultimately, that was probably a $50 million to $100 million opportunity for us.
Operator
And our next question comes from Patrick Donnelly with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.
Charlie -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Hi guys, this is Charlie on for Patrick. Appreciate the guidance raise for organic growth. Just curious, as we look out to 4Q, obviously a bit of a step down. Is that mostly just a product of the comp from last year or are there any kind of changes you're making in terms of the outlook by end market?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
No, I would say it's mostly attributable to the comp. We're going up against, I think a 7% number in fourth quarter of 2017. So we just want to be cognizant of that.
Charlie -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
And then for Vanadis, recognize that the CE mark hasn't come in yet. But are you still expecting, I think you'd called out a $5 million contribution previously for this year, and then as we think about going into 2019, what kind of ramp should we be thinking about for next year?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Let me spend a second on Vanadis. So I would say, we continue to go through the normal process for CE mark approval. We received, I would say a couple of recent questions from the regulatory body and we responded as quickly as possible. And I would say at this point, we don't anticipate any problems with approval. Right now, we understand the instrument and reagent reviews are complete. But the software has taken a little bit longer.
And I think as we've mentioned previously, we decided to use our life cycle software for Vanadis result reporting, and we felt this would provide an easy transition of the technology for our current customers who use the life cycle further biochemical prenatal testing. So the software now will not only incorporate risk factors, biochemical data and relevant (inaudible) information, but it also has the Vanadis data and we think this will give very complete information to the healthcare providers.
Unfortunately, as I said, I think that's slowing down the approval a little bit, but we do think it's eminent here. But relative to the revenue side, I would say, while the timing is somewhat later than at least originally anticipated, we continue to ramp up both the operations, the service capabilities. We're still on track to install the Vanadis and I think it's 10 labs this year and beyond that we'll work with biochemical customers in Europe that convert.
I would say on a revenue standpoint, in the fourth quarter forecast we have taken it down a little bit and what we're doing is we're focusing more on placing new instruments into the labs, and I think as we mentioned before, a lot of these are reagent rental based. So we do think the revenue will be lower than what we initially anticipated. We don't think it impacts the 2019 ramp, and of course it's built into our forecast that Jamey talked about.
With regard to the 2019 revenue, again as we mentioned before, it's a little early to start talking about specific numbers in 2019. But clearly, when we give guidance, we'll try and be specific as to what numbers to assume for Vanadis.
Operator
Our next question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Brandon Couillard -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Rob, nice to see, I guess more portfolio pruning, if you will. Would be curious to what extent you see an opportunity or scope for additional divestitures similar to the multispectral imaging unit. And then given the balance sheet, should be coming in south of three turns of net leverage at the end of the year, I'd be curious how you're thinking about the M&A pipeline here?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I think we've talked about before that somewhere in the sort of $50 million, maybe $100 million in revenues. So we continue to sort of, I would say, pressure-test the portfolio to make sure that we've got the right group of assets. Could it be another one or two product lines that go possibly, but I think I've been fairly consistent, I don't see any significant divestitures of the assets that we have today.
With regard to the pipeline, I think we continue to look at bolt-on deals. I mentioned that Dani acquisition, it's a relatively small company in Italy , but we're excited about the capabilities they have particularly around gas chromatography and more specifically in headspace and auto sampling technology. So we'll continue to do a number of those things. I mean if you look at -- we did SSI in China, we did RHS in Australia a little earlier. I mean, we'll probably spend $100 million this year, and hopefully in 2019, we'll step it up a little bit. As you point out, we're getting very comfortable with the balance sheet, as we expect to end the year under three times EBITDA. And particularly on the DAS side, we're focused in food and building out our reagent capabilities.
Brandon Couillard -- Jefferies -- Analyst
And then a couple of housekeeping items for Jamey. What should we pencil in for free cash flow for the year, as well as CapEx. I would be curious (inaudible) that CapEx number higher this year, and if you expect that to continue in 2019. And then any update on net interest expense for 2018?
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
So, Brandon, as I mentioned on the last call, with regards to cash flow, we always have a stronger second half and in the third quarter that played out with adjusted free cash flow of just over $80 million versus the first half $50 million. So penciling in for the year, there's probably a little bit of pressure versus our original $3.65 due to what I talked to in my prepared remarks. We've got the moves in Singapore, which is now planned to move in the first quarter, the moves in China, higher organic growth rate. We're not giving up on the goal, but there might be $25 million to $50 million of pressure to that number. But we don't think it's anything structural and it should be corrected in the coming quarters here.
With regards to CapEx, I'd pencil in $75 million to $80 million. I think we're roughly $60 million through the first three quarters. So, it shouldn't be too different from that. And then the last one was interest expenses, is that right?
Brandon Couillard -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Yes. Net interest and other.
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, I think it'll be pretty similar to the third quarter here. So net $14 million or $15 million that we experienced in the third quarter; interest expense and other income that is.
Operator
And our next question comes from Jack Meehan with Barclays. Your line is now open.
Mitchell Petersen -- Barclays -- Analyst
Thanks. This is actually Mitchell Petersen on for Jack this afternoon. And it looks like Europe took a step down in the quarter in terms of growth. I was just hoping you could unpack what you saw by end market there and comment on if you're seeing any particular areas of weakness there? Thanks.
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
No, I mean, a little bit of this was a tougher comp year-over-year, but we had softer -- it was a little softer in applied markets, industrial was down 3%, food, we had some drought in Europe, so that took a hit. So while food was up 10% or double-digit overall, in Europe it was down pretty significantly due to the droughts in the summer here, and then we had pretty tough comparisons in pharma, biotech year-over-year and in informatics. So I don't think anything structural though.
Mitchell Petersen -- Barclays -- Analyst
And then on EUROIMMUN, I was hoping you could provide some more detail just on the cost and margin opportunity there, where are margins today in relation to the diagnostic average and where do you think you can get those longer-term, and what are some of the cost levers that you can pull to get you there?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I think as we mentioned, when we acquired EUROIMMUN, it was around 20% operating margins. Our diagnostic business last year was in the low 30s. I think it gives you a sense of the opportunity. I would say throughout the year and I would say this is largely been through the volume leverage because I think as we've talked about, we haven't really done much from an integration perspective there, particularly on the cost side. So we've seen a couple of hundred basis points of margin expansion in EUROIMMUN just from the volume leverage and they continue to have very favorable mix, about 90% or 91% of their revenue is reagent base. So I think we can just through volume leverage get that up to sort of mid maybe even high 20s. And then as we get into sort of maybe not '19, but in '20, we'll look at driving some synergies across the business from a cost perspective.
Operator
Our next question comes from Dan Arias with Citigroup. Your line is now open.
Dan Arias -- Citigroup -- Analyst
A follow-up on Vanadis, Jamey. What is the assumption for the margin impact from that platform when it launches? I think it carries a pretty good profile once it's up in a ramp, but I'm just curious about what you should expect on profitability in the immediate term when we do see the regulatory announcement?
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I think it will depend, Dan, on how much -- as Rob mentioned, we think we're going to be more of a reagent rental model, but we're really figuring that out with customers right now. And it depends on how much will it take on instrument sales versus reagent rental. If it's more reagent rentals, we think that's accretive. If it's instrument sales, we might have to wait a little bit until some of the samples get processed. So it's a little tough to tell for 2019 at this point.
Dan Arias -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Okay, if you had to use your baseline guess right now, what do you think the chances are that post the announcement you end up talking about there being some dilution from the product just based on previous expectations?
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
If you're referring to the fourth quarter, Dan, I don't think it's going to be very material at all. As Rob mentioned, he said we're going to be less than $5 million, we've taken that down quite a bit. So in the guidance for the fourth quarter, it's very, very nominal. If you're referring to next year, that's a little tough.
Dan Arias -- Citigroup -- Analyst
And then maybe, Rob, on the expanded sequencing business, can you just touch on where you are with the validation of the NovaSeqs that you bought, I don't think you mentioned that. Is capacity a bottleneck there at all? And then how do you think you'll exit the year just in terms of the split between samples that are coming from patients versus pharma, and then maybe how does that change in 2019?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
So we're clearly -- the run rate sort of north of the 10 million that we talked about. So the demand for that business continues to be very strong. Jamey mentioned the fact that we've put a new sort of LIMS system and that sort of caused a little bit of a bottleneck, but we're catching up with that. The five NovaSeqs have been added to the lab, they're in the process of being validated. I think that's probably going to come online either late in the fourth quarter or early 2019.
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
The only thing I'd add to that on the LIMS is that -- so that is how we work with customers from a receiving of a sample perspective. So that helps open up the intake. We still have one piece of software on a reporting system that won't be done until the first quarter which really kind of rounds out our software implementation.
Operator
Our next question comes from Steve Beuchaw with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.
Steve Beuchaw -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
I (inaudible) on EUROIMMUN. I wonder, Rob, now that you've had the business for roughly a year, if you guys take a step -- I mean, we've talked about some of the regional opportunities, automation opportunities, a lot of the skill set there that might have been incremental to your thinking when we, back in the summer of 2017, we are talking about the growth outlook for that business. Can you just talk about how your thinking has evolved on the medium-term growth outlook for EUROIMMUN. And then, sort of we're at -- Jamey, any chance you have the EUROIMMUN ex currency or core growth for the quarter?
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, core growth for the quarter, ex-currency was up 11% and then year-to-date, we're up 13%.
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
So, Steve, with regard to the growth, we've said for a fair amount of time that we think EUROIMMUN probably grows mid-teens and our expectation is that we will achieve that in 2018. So we don't see or at least I don't see any reason why that changes over the next couple of years. With regard to growth, I would say the one thing that has changed since we've owned EUROIMMUN is our belief that the EUROIMMUN capabilities can drive incremental growth in the core PerkinElmer business.
And I think that's been the biggest change as we sort of have a better appreciation for what their capabilities are and as I sort of tried to give an impression in my prepared remarks is we think increasingly that these assets -- as well as some of the other acquisitions we've made, are very synergistic across whether it's therapeutics, diagnostics, food. There's clearly a blurring of the capabilities and technologies being used in those end markets. And I think we feel better about the opportunity for EUROIMMUN to enable incremental growth in what historically were the PerkinElmer markets.
Steve Beuchaw -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
And then just one clarification for Jamey. Jamey -- well, and I should say thanks, Rob for all the detail that you gave on the impact of the LTPP on comp expense in the quarter. Jamey, I just want to make sure that as you make the comment about expectations for the Company to hit that 20% in '20 and beyond, 2020 that is, margin goal, that, number one, we expect this comp issue to be something of a one-off kind of back to trend beyond this year. And then number two, I wonder if you could sort of elaborate on what it is you've seen in your first several months here as CFO that gives you comfort giving us a commentary about confidence in the medium term margin plan?
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, sure. With regards to LTPP being a one-off, assuming a normal stock price increase, then it will be a one-off. If it drastically increases like it did in the third quarter and then obviously we'll have an additional expense for that. But what gives me confidence is, if you look at this year, we're going to be up well over 100 basis points, excluding foreign exchange and if you look at what we posted on the website, our foreign exchange this year will have an impact of -- increase in revenue of $20 million and then a $0.10 pressure on EPS.
So absent that, we're in the 120 to 150 range. So assuming that happens two more years in a row here, then we have full expectations that we're going to continue to grow, then that should replicate in the next couple of years. And I'd say it's driven by three things, one is the mix of businesses. So as the diagnostics business grows faster, along EUROIMMUN and the rest of the core, and that should have increased opportunity on our margin line.
Number two is the volume leverage, I've mentioned in the past that we don't have a lot of infrastructure that we need. We have a good base to be able to take advantage of. And three, we've got a lot of discipline around cost out. We've got a whole team, particularly on the DAS side but also on the Dx side that's working on product teardowns, different sourcing, value engineering. And so I think as we look at the margin expansion, we think it's about a third, a third, a third in in each of those categories. Mix, leverage and then our cost out activities that we're driving.
Operator
Our next question comes from Derik De Bruin with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is now open.
Derik De Bruin -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
So actually I just wanted to follow-up on Steve's question there. So guys, I thought you said earlier in the call that EUROIMMUN was tracking at 15%, did I mishear that?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, for the year, we're expecting 15%. So in the fourth quarter, we're expecting it to be north of 20% in EUROIMMUN because we've got -- as we look at our order book, we think that's what it will deliver. So year-to-date 13%, the fourth quarter end which we expect, as I said, I think it's $102 million of sales. That gets you to the year at 15%.
Derik De Bruin -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
And you've done those three acquisitions and you gave us the divestiture amount. Can you tell us what the incremental revenues are from the three acquisitions that you've done?
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
So I think Dani is like about $10 million, SSI is less than that, probably more like $5 million and RHS less than $5 million.
Operator
Our next question comes from Catherine Schulte with Baird. Your line is now open.
Catherine Schulte -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Just one from me, with the guidance range for core organic revenue growth for the year, what are the new assumptions for DAS versus diagnostics? It sounds like most of the upside is in DAS. Is that right?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
For the year or for the fourth quarter?
Catherine Schulte -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
For the year.
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Relative to the original guide? That's correct. Where we're seeing the -- most of the overperformance is on the DAS side, relative to our guidance at the beginning of the year. That's correct.
Operator
Our next question comes from Steve Willoughby with Cleveland Research. Your line is now open.
Stephen Willoughby -- Cleveland Research -- Analyst
Two questions for you. First, there is a comment regarding the LIMS system installing in your genomics services business. Is the disruption that you mentioned, are you through that now or is that something that lingers into the fourth quarter. And then secondly, Rob, the increased stock comp expense that looks like, (inaudible) mark-to-market or at least a portion of it. Will you get some of that back here in the fourth quarter, now that the stock is lower than probably where it was during the third quarter?
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I'll take the LIMS one. So as I try to mention earlier, there's really two portions to really complete our software package in genomics testing. One is the LIMS system, which is up and running now. That will increase sequentially from the third quarter to the fourth quarter, the ability for us to take in samples and we do have a little bit of extra revenue in the fourth quarter as a result of that. But we're really not humming until the first quarter when we finalize our -- what we call our odin (ph) system, which is really a reporting system. So as opposed to the geneticists looking and writing out separately one by one, every single sample, it's more of an automated system. So once that's really up and running, then it's kind of, the floodgates open here, let's say.
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
To answer the second question, yes, theoretically if the stock stays exactly where it is, we're down 6%, 7% from when we close the quarter, at least when we close the books. So yes, the way it works is, every quarter we revalue the cash compensation liability to whatever the stock price is.
Operator
Thank you. This does conclude today's question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call back to CEO and Chairman, Rob Friel, for any further remarks.
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Well, first of all, thanks for your questions and your interest in PerkinElmer. As we head into the end of the year, I continue to be very confident in our ability to drive our strategy and build upon the terrific momentum we've seen so far, which I think sets us up for an even more successful 2017.
Before I close the call though, I would like to mention that, as I think some of you know, Tommy has recently been promoted to the CFO of our Service Business within DAS. And therefore, this could be his last earnings call as Vice President of Investor Relations. I wanted to thank him publicly for his terrific effort over the last six years as he has both contemporized our Investor Relations function, as well as increased the visibility of PerkinElmer within the investor community.
And while we tried to take more credit for the stock appreciation then he deserves, I must admit his impact was not insignificant. While we leaves big shoes to fill, we hopefully will have someone in the role by early next year. In the meantime, we've asked Tommy to do double duty. However, I'm confident our service business will get lots of Tommy's attention as I know he has many ideas to help elevate its performance.
With that, let me close the call. Thanks again for joining us this afternoon and have a great evening. And I hope you enjoy what's left of Halloween.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program. You may all have a big day and thank you.
Duration: 63 minutes
Call participants:
Tommy Thomas -- Vice President of Investor Relations
Robert Friel -- Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
James Mock -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Daniel Brennan -- UBS -- Analyst
Tycho Peterson -- JP Morgan -- Analyst
Chris -- Cowen -- Analyst
Dan Leonard -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst
Charlie -- Goldman Sachs -- Analyst
Brandon Couillard -- Jefferies -- Analyst
Mitchell Petersen -- Barclays -- Analyst
Dan Arias -- Citigroup -- Analyst
Steve Beuchaw -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst
Derik De Bruin -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst
Catherine Schulte -- Robert W. Baird -- Analyst
Stephen Willoughby -- Cleveland Research -- Analyst
Transcript powered by AlphaStreet
This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.
More From The Motley Fool
Motley Fool Transcribers has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
