Advertisement
New Zealand markets closed
  • NZX 50

    12,325.60
    -3.84 (-0.03%)
     
  • NZD/USD

    0.6011
    -0.0039 (-0.64%)
     
  • NZD/EUR

    0.5519
    -0.0024 (-0.44%)
     
  • ALL ORDS

    8,209.20
    -63.50 (-0.77%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,971.60
    -64.90 (-0.81%)
     
  • OIL

    80.25
    -2.57 (-3.10%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,402.80
    -53.60 (-2.18%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,522.62
    -182.47 (-0.93%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,155.72
    -49.17 (-0.60%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    40,287.53
    -377.49 (-0.93%)
     
  • DAX

    18,171.93
    -182.83 (-1.00%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,417.68
    -360.73 (-2.03%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,063.79
    -62.56 (-0.16%)
     
  • NZD/JPY

    94.6330
    -0.5090 (-0.53%)
     

Revelstone Capital Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:RCAC) is definitely on the radar of institutional investors who own 30% of the company

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Revelstone Capital Acquisition implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership

  • Insiders own 13% of Revelstone Capital Acquisition

If you want to know who really controls Revelstone Capital Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ:RCAC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 30% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Revelstone Capital Acquisition, beginning with the chart below.

Check out our latest analysis for Revelstone Capital Acquisition

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Revelstone Capital Acquisition?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Revelstone Capital Acquisition. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Revelstone Capital Acquisition's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It would appear that 30% of Revelstone Capital Acquisition shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Tenor Capital Management Company, L.P. is currently the largest shareholder, with 6.5% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Saba Capital Management, L.P. and AQR Capital Management, LLC, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.3%. In addition, we found that Morgan Callagy, the CEO has 3.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of Revelstone Capital Acquisition

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Revelstone Capital Acquisition Corp.. It has a market capitalization of just US$217m, and insiders have US$28m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Revelstone Capital Acquisition. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Revelstone Capital Acquisition (2 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.