New Zealand markets closed
  • NZX 50

    11,065.15
    -37.69 (-0.34%)
     
  • NZD/USD

    0.6537
    +0.0054 (+0.83%)
     
  • NZD/EUR

    0.6090
    +0.0054 (+0.89%)
     
  • ALL ORDS

    7,413.10
    +73.80 (+1.01%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,182.70
    +76.80 (+1.08%)
     
  • OIL

    114.92
    +0.83 (+0.73%)
     
  • GOLD

    1,857.50
    +3.60 (+0.19%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    12,634.63
    +357.84 (+2.91%)
     
  • FTSE

    7,585.46
    +20.54 (+0.27%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    33,083.79
    +446.60 (+1.37%)
     
  • DAX

    14,462.19
    +230.90 (+1.62%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    20,697.36
    +581.16 (+2.89%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    26,781.68
    +176.84 (+0.66%)
     
  • NZD/JPY

    83.0200
    +0.7030 (+0.85%)
     

What Type Of Shareholders Make Up ironSource Ltd.'s (NYSE:IS) Share Registry?

·5-min read

If you want to know who really controls ironSource Ltd. (NYSE:IS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

ironSource is a pretty big company. It has a market capitalization of US$6.6b. Normally institutions would own a significant portion of a company this size. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about ironSource.

See our latest analysis for ironSource

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ironSource?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that ironSource does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ironSource's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in ironSource. Our data shows that Viola Ventures is the largest shareholder with 7.2% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Roi Milrad and Itay Milrad, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 5.8%. Additionally, the company's CEO Tomer Bar-Zeev directly holds 5.7% of the total shares outstanding.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 19 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of ironSource

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in ironSource Ltd.. Insiders own US$1.8b worth of shares in the US$6.6b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 7.2%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 25%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ironSource better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with ironSource , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting