Advertisement
New Zealand markets closed
  • NZX 50

    12,823.89
    +55.35 (+0.43%)
     
  • NZD/USD

    0.6071
    +0.0011 (+0.18%)
     
  • NZD/EUR

    0.5594
    +0.0004 (+0.08%)
     
  • ALL ORDS

    8,551.20
    -72.90 (-0.85%)
     
  • ASX 200

    8,283.20
    -72.70 (-0.87%)
     
  • OIL

    71.13
    +0.46 (+0.65%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,724.20
    +16.70 (+0.62%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    20,190.42
    +16.38 (+0.08%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,385.13
    +56.06 (+0.67%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    43,239.05
    +161.35 (+0.37%)
     
  • DAX

    19,583.39
    +150.58 (+0.77%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    20,692.40
    +613.30 (+3.05%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,981.75
    +70.56 (+0.18%)
     
  • NZD/JPY

    90.9490
    -0.0110 (-0.01%)
     

DigiAsia Corp.'s (NASDAQ:FAAS) market cap rose US$68m last week; private companies who hold 35% profited and so did insiders

Key Insights

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in DigiAsia indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy

  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership

  • Insider ownership in DigiAsia is 32%

A look at the shareholders of DigiAsia Corp. (NASDAQ:FAAS) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 35% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

While private companies were the group that benefitted the most from last week’s US$68m market cap gain, insiders too had a 32% share in those profits.

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about DigiAsia.

Check out our latest analysis for DigiAsia

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DigiAsia?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. DigiAsia might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in DigiAsia. Interchange Payment Group Holding Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. Alexander Rusli is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Prashant Gokarn holds about 12% of the company stock. Interestingly, the bottom two of the top three shareholders also hold the title of Co-Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, suggesting that these insiders have a personal stake in the company.

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

Insider Ownership Of DigiAsia

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of DigiAsia Corp.. Insiders have a US$33m stake in this US$101m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 35%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 9.1% of the DigiAsia shares on issue. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for DigiAsia you should be aware of.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.