Advertisement
New Zealand markets closed
  • NZX 50

    11,794.81
    +48.15 (+0.41%)
     
  • NZD/USD

    0.6147
    +0.0027 (+0.45%)
     
  • NZD/EUR

    0.5665
    +0.0011 (+0.19%)
     
  • ALL ORDS

    8,070.10
    -9.10 (-0.11%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,822.30
    -9.50 (-0.12%)
     
  • OIL

    83.44
    -0.44 (-0.52%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,399.80
    +30.40 (+1.28%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    20,391.97
    +205.33 (+1.02%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,203.93
    -37.33 (-0.45%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,375.87
    +67.87 (+0.17%)
     
  • DAX

    18,475.45
    +24.97 (+0.14%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    17,799.61
    -228.67 (-1.27%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,912.37
    -1.28 (-0.00%)
     
  • NZD/JPY

    98.7910
    +0.1840 (+0.19%)
     

Institutional investors control 78% of QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) and were rewarded last week after stock increased 3.3%

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in QUALCOMM implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • The top 25 shareholders own 45% of the company

  • Insiders have been selling lately

Every investor in QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 78% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Last week’s 3.3% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 78% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of QUALCOMM, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for QUALCOMM

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About QUALCOMM?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in QUALCOMM. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see QUALCOMM's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in QUALCOMM. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 4.5% of the stock.

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of QUALCOMM

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that QUALCOMM Incorporated insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$163m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over QUALCOMM. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for QUALCOMM that you should be aware of.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com