Advertisement
New Zealand markets closed
  • NZX 50

    11,682.39
    -89.42 (-0.76%)
     
  • NZD/USD

    0.6126
    +0.0004 (+0.06%)
     
  • NZD/EUR

    0.5713
    -0.0000 (-0.01%)
     
  • ALL ORDS

    8,028.10
    +16.00 (+0.20%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,785.60
    +16.20 (+0.21%)
     
  • OIL

    82.34
    +0.17 (+0.21%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,377.70
    +8.70 (+0.37%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    19,752.30
    -156.56 (-0.79%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,272.46
    +67.35 (+0.82%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    39,134.76
    +299.90 (+0.77%)
     
  • DAX

    18,254.18
    +186.27 (+1.03%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,075.71
    -259.61 (-1.42%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,601.35
    -31.67 (-0.08%)
     
  • NZD/JPY

    97.3290
    +0.1090 (+0.11%)
     

With 57% ownership, Arcadis NV (AMS:ARCAD) boasts of strong institutional backing

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Arcadis' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • The top 11 shareholders own 51% of the company

  • Insiders have been selling lately

If you want to know who really controls Arcadis NV (AMS:ARCAD), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Arcadis.

View our latest analysis for Arcadis

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Arcadis?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Arcadis. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Arcadis' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Arcadis. Stichting Lovinklaan is currently the company's largest shareholder with 18% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 4.0% of the stock.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Arcadis

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Arcadis NV. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own €43m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Arcadis. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 18%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Arcadis , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.