Advertisement
New Zealand markets closed
  • NZX 50

    11,938.08
    +64.04 (+0.54%)
     
  • NZD/USD

    0.6013
    +0.0050 (+0.84%)
     
  • NZD/EUR

    0.5585
    +0.0030 (+0.53%)
     
  • ALL ORDS

    7,897.50
    +48.10 (+0.61%)
     
  • ASX 200

    7,629.00
    +42.00 (+0.55%)
     
  • OIL

    78.80
    -0.15 (-0.19%)
     
  • GOLD

    2,299.70
    -9.90 (-0.43%)
     
  • NASDAQ

    17,842.50
    +300.96 (+1.72%)
     
  • FTSE

    8,212.98
    +40.83 (+0.50%)
     
  • Dow Jones

    38,593.46
    +367.80 (+0.96%)
     
  • DAX

    17,984.96
    +88.46 (+0.49%)
     
  • Hang Seng

    18,475.92
    +268.79 (+1.48%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,236.07
    -37.98 (-0.10%)
     
  • NZD/JPY

    91.8900
    +0.3150 (+0.34%)
     

With 63% institutional ownership, Haymaker Acquisition Corp. 4 (NYSE:HYAC) is a favorite amongst the big guns

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Haymaker Acquisition 4 implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • The top 9 shareholders own 53% of the company

  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Haymaker Acquisition Corp. 4 (NYSE:HYAC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 63% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Haymaker Acquisition 4.

View our latest analysis for Haymaker Acquisition 4

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haymaker Acquisition 4?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Haymaker Acquisition 4. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Haymaker Acquisition 4's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It would appear that 6.9% of Haymaker Acquisition 4 shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Haymaker Ventures, LLC with 17% of shares outstanding. Wealthspring Capital LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and HGC Investment Management Inc. holds about 6.9% of the company stock.

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

Insider Ownership Of Haymaker Acquisition 4

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

Private equity firms hold a 17% stake in Haymaker Acquisition 4. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Haymaker Acquisition 4 (including 2 which are potentially serious) .

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.