Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. (2145.HK)

46.100 +0.300 (+0.66%) At close: 04:08PM HKT

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd.

Building B
25 Floor No. 3300 Zhongshan North Road Putuo District
Shanghai 200063
China
86 21 5203 5555
https://www.chicmaxgroup.com

Sector(s): Consumer Defensive
Industry: Household & Personal Products
Full-time employees: 1,883

Key executives

Name	Title	Pay	Exercised	Year born
Mr. Yifeng Feng	Deputy CEO, CFO & Executive Director	1.37M	N/A	1980
Ms. Ying Cao	Director of Legal Department & Employee Representative Supervisor	N/A	N/A	1980
Dr. Wei Li	Head of Global R&D Center and VP	N/A	N/A	N/A
Mr. Kin Wai Li	Joint Company Secretary	N/A	N/A	1989

Amounts are as of 31 December 2022, and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay includes salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in HKD.

Description

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd., a multi-brand cosmetics company, engages in the research, development, manufacture, and sale of skincare, maternity, and childcare products in China. The company offers a range of cosmetics, such as essence creams, lotions, facial masks, and other skincare and hair care products under the KANS, One Leaf, Baby Elephant, asnami, KYOCA, newpage, ARMIYO, 632, 2032, TAZU, Hanshu, Yizhiye, and Red Little Elephant brands. It also engages in the supply chain management activities. The company was formerly known as Shanghai Kaka Cosmetic Co., Ltd. and changed its name to Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. in 2020. Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd. was founded in 2002 and is headquartered in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China.

Corporate governance

Shanghai Chicmax Cosmetic Co., Ltd.’s ISS governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while 10 indicates higher governance risk.